In conversation with Lori Passmore.

Lori Passmore is a Group Leader at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (MRC-LMB). She studied Biochemistry at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver (Canada), before moving to the UK in 1999 for a PhD at the Institute of Cancer Research. After completing her PhD, Lori moved to Cambridge, where she became a Post-Doctoral Fellow at the MRC-LMB. In 2009, Lori started her own group at the MRC-LMB and was subsequently awarded an ERC Starting Grant (2011), an ERC Consolidator Grant (2017) and a Wellcome Discovery Award (2023). She was also elected into the EMBO Young Investigator Programme (2015) and EMBO Membership (2018). Lori's research focusses on the determination of the structures of protein complexes that regulate gene expression, using primarily cryo-electron microscopy and in vitro assays. Her work has contributed significantly to our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of cellular processes, giving insights into human physiology and disease. In this interview, Lori provides an overview of her research and discusses current challenges in the field, recalls the key events and collaborations that have helped shape her successful research career and offers advice to early career scientists.

Cancer epigenetics: promises and pitfalls for cancer therapy.

Over the past few decades, epigenetic regulators have emerged as major players in cellular processes that drive cancer initiation and progression, and subsequently modulate the responsiveness of cancers to therapeutic agents. This Special Issue of The FEBS Journal, Cancer Epigenetics, features an exciting collection of review articles that focus on the functions of a broad spectrum of epigenetic modulators in cancer. The diverse topics explored herein range from the roles of transposable elements and chromatin architecture in cancer and the most recent research advances on cancer-associated histone variants (oncohistones), to the effects of altered epigenetics on transcription and advanced cancer cell phenotypes. Moreover, the prospective key function of cancer metabolism in linking epigenetics and transcriptional regulation, and the potential of epigenetics for targeted cancer therapeutics is discussed. We hope that this collection of articles will give readers an enlightening overview of the most recent advances in the fast-moving field of cancer epigenetics.

In conversation with Christine Watson.

Christine J. Watson is Professor of Cell and Cancer Biology at the University of Cambridge. Christine obtained her Bachelor's (honors) degree in Biochemistry at the University of Glasgow in 1975 and, after a soujourn in Glauco Tocchini-Valentini's lab at the Institute of Cell Biology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche in Rome, she undertook a PhD in Molecular Genetics at Imperial College London. During her PhD, she looked at differences in gene expression between differentiated and undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma stem cells, inspiring an early interest in gene expression and cell fate determination. Between 1986 and 1992, Christine undertook three postdoctoral research positions that took her from London back to Scotland, where she was first introduced to mammary gland biology through her work with John Clark at the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh. During her time in the Clark lab, Christine identified a factor - later shown to be STAT5 - that binds to the promoter of the milk protein gene ß-lactoglobulin. This prompted further work identifying the key role played by the STAT family of transcription factors in mammary gland development. Shortly afterwards, Christine became a group leader at the Roslin Institute and later relocated to the University of Edinburgh to collaborate with Andrew Wyllie. This led to her recruitment to the University of Cambridge in 1998, where she has remained to date. Over the last two decades, the Watson lab has focused on elucidating the mechanisms underlying lineage commitment of mammary stem and progenitor cells and the regulation of cell death in involuting mammary gland. In this interview, Christine discusses her research highlights and provides a glimpse into her personal interests, as she moves towards retirement.

COVID-19 breakthroughs: separating fact from fiction.

The newly recognised coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, causative agent of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has caused a pandemic with huge ramifications for human interactions around the globe. As expected, research efforts to understand the virus and curtail the disease are moving at a frantic pace alongside the spread of rumours, speculations and falsehoods. In this article, we aim to clarify the current scientific view behind several claims or controversies related to COVID-19. Starting with the origin of the virus, we then discuss the effect of ibuprofen and nicotine on the severity of the disease. We highlight the knowledge on fomites and SARS-CoV-2 and discuss the evidence and explications for a disproportionately stronger impact of COVID-19 on ethnic minorities, including a potential protective role for vitamin D. We further review what is known about the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children, including their role in transmission of the disease, and conclude with the science on different mortality rates between different countries and whether this hints at the existence of more pathogenic cohorts of SARS-CoV-2.

In conversation with Gerard Evan.

Gerard Evan is Head of Department and Sir William Dunn Professor at the Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, UK. Driven by his innate passion to understand how things work, Gerard has devoted much of his career to understanding the molecular basis of cancer, particularly the roles played by oncogenes such as Myc. His work has helped elucidate the complex role that this gene plays in cell proliferation and apoptosis, and paved new avenues for the treatment of aggressive cancers. In this interview, Gerard provides an overview of what is known about the role of Myc in normal and cancer cells and provides a persuasive argument for the application of 'impersonalised therapy' involving Myc inhibition as part of future chemotherapeutic drug regimes.

In conversation with Greg Winter.

Sir Gregory Winter, Research Leader Emeritus at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB) in Cambridge, UK is best known for his pioneering work on humanised and human therapeutic antibodies. Greg's research career has been entirely based in Cambridge. After studying Natural Sciences at Cambridge University, he undertook his PhD, focused on determining the amino acid sequence of bacterial tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase, at the LMB, where he remained for postdoctoral research and the ensuing establishment of his own research group. His long-standing interest in protein and nucleic acid sequencing led to the development of techniques to 'humanise' mouse monoclonal antibodies and to make human antibodies directly, resulting in promising antibody-based therapies for cancer and autoimmune diseases. Greg has founded three biotech companies, including Cambridge Antibody Technology and Bicycle Therapeutics. He has also received numerous awards and honours in recognition of his revolutionary work in the antibody engineering field, most notably the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in October 2018. One year on, he discusses the impact of this award on his life and future career outlook in an interview with The FEBS Journal.

Fruit flies on the front line: the translational impact of Drosophila.

Drosophila melanogaster has been adopted as one of the most-used model systems since it was first introduced by Thomas Morgan for the study of heredity in the early 20th century. Its experimental tractability and similarity of its biological pathways to those of humans have placed the model at the forefront of research into human development and disease. With the ongoing accumulation of genetic tools and assays, the fly community has at its fingertips the resources to generate diverse Drosophila disease models for the study of genes and pathways involved in a wide range of disorders. In recent years, the fly has also been used successfully for drug screening. In this Editorial, we introduce a Special Collection of reviews, interviews and original research articles that highlight some of the many ways that Drosophila has made, and continues to make, an impact on basic biological insights and translational science.

Sorting of early and late flagellar subunits after docking at the membrane ATPase of the type III export pathway.

The bacterial flagellum assembles in a strict order, with structural subunits delivered to the growing flagellum by a type III export pathway. Early rod-and-hook subunits are exported before completion of the hook, at which point a subunit-specificity switch allows export of late filament subunits. This implies that in bacteria with multiple flagella at different stages of assembly, each export pathway can discriminate and sort unchaperoned early and chaperoned late subunits. To establish whether subunit sorting is distinct from subunit transition from the cytosol to the membrane, in particular docking at the membrane-associated FliI ATPase, the pathway was manipulated in vivo. When ATP hydrolysis by the FliI ATPase was disabled and when the pathway was locked into an early export state, both unchaperoned early and chaperoned late subunits stalled and accumulated at the inner membrane. Furthermore, a chaperone that attenuates late subunit export by stalling when docked at the wild-type ATPase also stalled at the ATPase in an early-locked pathway and inhibited export of early subunits in both native and early-locked pathways. These data indicate that the pathways for early and late subunits converge at the FliI ATPase, independent of ATP hydrolysis, before a distinct, separable sorting step. To ascertain the likely signals for sorting, the export of recombinant subunits was assayed. Late filament subunits unable to bind their chaperones were still sorted accurately, but chaperoned late subunits were directed through an early-locked pathway when fused to early subunit N-terminal export signal regions. Furthermore, while an early subunit signal directed export of a heterologous type III export substrate through both native and early-locked pathways, a late subunit signal only directed export via native pathways. These data suggest that subunits are distinguished not by late chaperones but by N-terminal export signals of the subunits themselves.